Did the house of Saul die together?
Posted on Oct.16, 2009. Filed in 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Chronicles. Average rating: 2.0 / 10 (Rate It).
Saul’s reign as king ended in death when the Philistines defeated Israel in battle. But who died with him?
In the account of Saul’s death in 1 Chronicles, Saul and all his house die together:
“Now the Philistines fought against Israel; and the men of Israel fled before the Philistines, and fell slain on Mount Gilboa. The Philistines overtook Saul and his sons; and the Philistines killed Jonathan and Abinadab and Malchishua, sons of Saul. The battle pressed hard on Saul; and the archers found him, and he was wounded by the archers. Then Saul said to his armour-bearer, ‘Draw your sword, and thrust me through with it, so that these uncircumcised may not come and make sport of me.’ But his armour-bearer was unwilling, for he was terrified. So Saul took his own sword and fell on it. When his armour-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he also fell on his sword and died. Thus Saul died; he and his three sons and all his house died together.” [1 Chronicles 10:1-6, NRSV]
Saul, however, did not have three sons but four:
“Ner became the father of Kish, Kish of Saul, Saul of Jonathan, Malchishua, Abindab, and Esh-baal…” [1 Chronicles 8:33, NRSV]
“Ner became the father of Kish, Kish of Saul, Saul of Jonathan, Malchishua, Abindab, and Esh-baal…” [1 Chronicles 9:39, NRSV]
The parallel passage in 1 Samuel 31 is subtly different to 1 Chronicles 10, saying not that all of Saul’s house died together but that all of his men died together:
“Now the Philistines fought against Israel; and the men of Israel fled before the Philistines, and many fell on Mount Gilboa. The Philistines overtook Saul and his sons; and the Philistines killed Jonathan and Abinadab and Malchishua, sons of Saul. The battle pressed hard upon Saul; the archers found him, and he was badly wounded by them. Then Saul said to his armour-bearer, ‘Draw your sword, and thrust me through with it, so that these uncircumcised may not come and thrust me through, and make sport of me.’ But his armour-bearer was unwilling; for he was terrified. So Saul took his own sword and fell upon it. When his armour-bearer saw that Saul was dead, he also fell upon his sword and died with him. So Saul and his three sons and his armour-bearer and all his men died together on the same day.” [1 Samuel 31:1-6, NRSV]
2 Samuel then goes on to describe Saul’s fourth son Ishbaal surviving him and succeeding him as king:
But Abner son of Ner, commander of Saul’s army, had taken Ishbaal son of Saul, and brought him over to Mahanaim. He made him king over Gilead, the Ashurites, Jezreel, Ephraim, Benjamin, and over all Israel. Ishbaal, Saul’s son, was forty years old when he began to reign over Israel, and he reigned for two years. [2 Samuel 2:8-10, NRSV]
So did the house of Saul die together, or was Saul succeeded as king by his fourth son Ishbaal?
N.B. All posts are written in a style sympathetic to the claim of Biblical error, even in cases where the author ("Errancy") disagrees with the claim. See the About page for the site's philosophy.
1 Comment Ratings
Inerrantist Responses
To suggest a response to this claim of error, please use the comments section below.
Rate this Claim of Error
How serious a problem for inerrancy do you think this is?
Average rating: 2.0 / 10
You must be logged in to rate errors.
October 17th, 2009 on 12:50 am
Chronicles says:
1) Saul died.
2) Saul’s three sons died.
3) Saul’s house died.
Samuel says:
1) Saul died.
2) Saul’s three sons died.
3) Saul’s men died.
“Saul’s house” refers to the same group that “Saul’s men” refers to: the group of Saul’s hirelings and retainers. In this context, I think it only refers to those of Saul’s hirelings that were present at the battle. Presumably, the passage did not intend to say that the cook in the palace died in this battle as well. The NASB captures this by translating the passage “all those of his house” where the NRSV says “all his house”.
Esh-Baal is not intended, by either Samuel or the Chronicler, to be among that group. Esh-Baal was a son, not a mere household man. Had the writer of either work intended to include Esh-Baal among the dead, he would have described his death as he did the other three sons, and said that Saul’s four sons had died.