Comments on: Theudas came after Gamaliel http://www.errancy.com/theudas-came-after-gamaliel/ Does the Bible contain contradictions or errors? Biblical inerrancy examined. Wed, 07 Sep 2011 04:23:00 +0200 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: WisdomLover http://www.errancy.com/theudas-came-after-gamaliel/comment-page-1/#comment-423 WisdomLover Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:26:01 +0000 http://www.errancy.com/?p=1156#comment-423 Because I view these issues as linked (this item is not an error at all, but proof that the other item is not an error either), I've left my longer comment on the other post That Errancy referenced in #2 above. Because I view these issues as linked (this item is not an error at all, but proof that the other item is not an error either), I’ve left my longer comment on the other post That Errancy referenced in #2 above.

]]> By: Errancy http://www.errancy.com/theudas-came-after-gamaliel/comment-page-1/#comment-420 Errancy Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:07:56 +0000 http://www.errancy.com/?p=1156#comment-420 N.B. This is obviously related to <a href="http://www.errancy.com/theudas-came-after-judas/" rel="nofollow">Theudas came after Judas</a>, but I've kept them separate because some solutions to that problem (e.g. "Gamaliel got confused") don't answer this one. N.B. This is obviously related to Theudas came after Judas, but I’ve kept them separate because some solutions to that problem (e.g. “Gamaliel got confused”) don’t answer this one.

]]> By: Amtiskaw http://www.errancy.com/theudas-came-after-gamaliel/comment-page-1/#comment-419 Amtiskaw Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:42:29 +0000 http://www.errancy.com/?p=1156#comment-419 Says the Oxford Bible Commentary: "Either Luke has made a mistake ... or Josephus has; or there was another, earlier Theudas." Says the Oxford Bible Commentary:

“Either Luke has made a mistake … or Josephus has; or there was another, earlier Theudas.”

]]>