<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many descendants did Jacob have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.errancy.com/how-many-descendants-did-jacob-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.errancy.com/how-many-descendants-did-jacob-have/</link>
	<description>Does the Bible contain contradictions or errors? Biblical inerrancy examined.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 04:23:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezekiel</title>
		<link>http://www.errancy.com/how-many-descendants-did-jacob-have/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>ezekiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errancy.com/?p=350#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I believe number 34 (Dinah) is the problem.  In every genealogy given in the Bible, females are only seldom mentioned.  Look at Christ&#039;s genealogy.  He has nearly 50 forefathers but 5 &quot;foremothers&quot;.

Dinah was simply not included when Jacob was said to have had 70 descendants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe number 34 (Dinah) is the problem.  In every genealogy given in the Bible, females are only seldom mentioned.  Look at Christ&#8217;s genealogy.  He has nearly 50 forefathers but 5 &#8220;foremothers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dinah was simply not included when Jacob was said to have had 70 descendants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errancy</title>
		<link>http://www.errancy.com/how-many-descendants-did-jacob-have/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Errancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errancy.com/?p=350#comment-436</guid>
		<description>It does look like the key should be in Leah&#039;s section of the genealogy (Genesis 46:8-15), where 34 names are listed but the count is given as 33. Whether it&#039;s Shaul or Dinah that&#039;s included on the list but excluded from the count I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does look like the key should be in Leah&#8217;s section of the genealogy (Genesis 46:8-15), where 34 names are listed but the count is given as 33. Whether it&#8217;s Shaul or Dinah that&#8217;s included on the list but excluded from the count I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WisdomLover</title>
		<link>http://www.errancy.com/how-many-descendants-did-jacob-have/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>WisdomLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errancy.com/?p=350#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Two responses seem possible here:

1) 70 is approximately equal to 71.

2) Among Jacob&#039;s grandchildren, only Shaul (number 12 in the full list) and the sons of Joseph include a special notation about their mother. There was obviously nothing shameful in the birth of Joseph&#039;s sons. There may have been in Shaul&#039;s birth. He might have been a bastard by the Canaanite woman. He might not have been counted in the total for Exodus for that reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two responses seem possible here:</p>
<p>1) 70 is approximately equal to 71.</p>
<p>2) Among Jacob&#8217;s grandchildren, only Shaul (number 12 in the full list) and the sons of Joseph include a special notation about their mother. There was obviously nothing shameful in the birth of Joseph&#8217;s sons. There may have been in Shaul&#8217;s birth. He might have been a bastard by the Canaanite woman. He might not have been counted in the total for Exodus for that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

