<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What was the capacity of Solomon&#8217;s cast sea, 2000 or 3000 baths?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.errancy.com/capacity-of-the-cast-sea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.errancy.com/capacity-of-the-cast-sea/</link>
	<description>Does the Bible contain contradictions or errors? Biblical inerrancy examined.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:32:59 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dysfunctional</title>
		<link>http://www.errancy.com/capacity-of-the-cast-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>dysfunctional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errancy.com/?p=183#comment-621</guid>
		<description>In the KJV the clause in 2CHR 4:5 reads,

&quot;...received and held 3,000 baths.&quot;

1 Kings says &quot;contained&quot; 2,000 baths.&quot;

I think the first implies maximum capacity;

the second the normal amount maintained.

There is no need to conclude copyist error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the KJV the clause in 2CHR 4:5 reads,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;received and held 3,000 baths.&#8221;</p>
<p>1 Kings says &#8220;contained&#8221; 2,000 baths.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the first implies maximum capacity;</p>
<p>the second the normal amount maintained.</p>
<p>There is no need to conclude copyist error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
